“Setting Guidelines for EM Exposures and Research Needs,” by Frank Barnes and Ben Greenebaum, Bioelectromagnetics, posted April 20, 2020.

“Over the last 20 years the evidence has become extremely strong that weaker EMF over the whole range for frequencies from static through mm waves can modify biological processes.” They propose starting with a limit of 0.1 V/m. Note that the 4 W/m2 (400 μW/cm2) that follows 0.1 V/m on p.5 of the letter was a slip-up and should not be there.

https://microwavenews.com/papers/new-approach-rf-limits

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Saving Landlines: A Critical Infrastructure for All

Landlines may be considered by some to be old fashioned, expensive and unnecessary in this…

1 day ago

5G – Is it safe? Bogus safety certificates – Discussion with Lara Hurley

18 Apr 2024 Lara Hurley, Heritage Party candidate, on The David Kurten Show – Tue…

2 days ago

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. “Cell phone radiation is bad for you.”

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He said: “We’re being poisoned and that is what we ought to…

3 days ago

Owl Box Wifi Camera Dangers – Give owls a break!

Microwave exposure is harmful to birds. The use of wifi cameras inside owl boxes (and…

4 days ago

Opting Out of a Smart Meter Is About Freedom and Health. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Gets That.

APR 27, 2024 By Helena Hjalmarsson, M.A., C.S.W., L.P., Special to The Kennedy Beacon “The cost…

5 days ago