Watch EHT Executive Director Theodora Scarato educate on conflict of interest with ICNIRP, the WHO and explain how 5G and cell phone radiation “science” is bought. Scarato is featured in the latest European expose “The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: Conflicts of interest , corporate capture and the push for 5G” by Klaus Buchner and Michèle Rivasi
Want to learn more more? Donate to EHT HERE or learn more by becoming an EHT Patron at https://www.patreon.com/ehtrust.
Critical published research papers we highlight include:
“Disconnect, the Truth about Cell Phones” by Devra Davis PhD, MPH covers the long history of how the cell phone indstry has been long aware of the dangers of cell phones, but twisted the truth, funded elected officials and pulled the wool over the public’s eyes.
The International Journal of Oncology published “World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health – a hard nut to crack (Review)” in 2017 detailing conflictos of interest with ICNIRP and the WHO EMF Project, both started with industry support.
- The American Journal of Industrial Medicine published “Secret ties to industry and conflicting interests in cancer research” in 2006 about industry funding of studies such as the Danish Cohort cell phone studies that are often put forward show no harm.
- Molecular and Clinical Oncology published “Appeals that matter or not on a moratorium on the deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, for microwave radiation” in 2020 published in details how ICNIRP is referred to as “a private German non-governmental organization. ICNIRP [that] relies on the evaluation only of thermal (heating) effects from RF radiation, thereby excluding a large body of published science demonstrating the detrimental effects caused by non-thermal radiation.”
- Environmental Health published Childhood Brain Tumour Risk and Its Association With Wireless Phones: A Commentary in 2011 about how a study called CEFALO on brain tumor risks for children using mobile phones” – authored by several ICNIRP scientists- did not provide assurances of safety as prompted by the study authors. In a 2019 letter signed by several expert scientists the misrepresentation of the CEFALO study was deemed to “represent scientific misconduct.”
- Environmental Research published Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and cancer: How source of funding affects results” in 2019 that found almost all government or independent studies find either a statistically significant association between magnetic field exposure and childhood leukemia, or an elevated risk “while almost all industry supported studies fail to find any significant or even suggestive association.”
- Neurological Sciences published “Mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours: a systematic review of association between study quality, source of funding, and research outcomes.” in 2017 . The review of the literature and meta-analysis of case–control studies found evidence linking mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours especially in long-term users (greater than 10 years) with a significantly positive correlation- higher quality studies show a statistically significant association between mobile phone use and risk of brain tumour. “Even the source of funding was found to affect the quality of results produced by the studies.”
Please also be aware of these investigative reports on industry influence:
- The Harvard Press Book “Captured Agency: How the Federal Communications Commission is Dominated by the Industries it Presumably Regulates” by Norm Alster documents the financial ties between the US federal government’s Federal communications Commission (FCC) and how, as a result, the wireless industry has bought inordinate access to—and power over—a major US regulatory agency. Read that here.
- “The Disinformation Campaign—And Massive Radiation Increase—Behind The 5G Rollout” by Mark Hertsgaard And Mark Dowie in The Nation April 23, 2018
- War on 5G: Amsterdam Investigation into Scientists Finds Telecom Influence by Jannes van Roermund and Paul Thacker, De Telegraaf (Amsterdam), Jun 2, 2020 (English translation) on the American Council on Science and Health attacks against Prof. Moskowitz and more.
- 2020, Is 5G Going to Kill Us, The New Republic by Christopher Ketcham“Modern public health calamities, from asbestos to auto safety to leaded gasoline and tobacco, often follow a predictable narrative. Industry dismisses the health risk, government regulators shrug and look away, and a beleaguered minority is left to sound the alarm” “Health and Cellphones: How Wireless Made Us Think Cell Phones Are Safe” Your Call, KALW 91.7FM San Francisco explores “how big wireless companies used the same playbook as big oil and big tobacco to deceive the public” with guests Dr. Devra Davis and Mark Hertsgaard.
- Democracy Now: How the Wireless Industry Convinced the Public Cellphones Are Safe & Cherry-Picked Research on Risks
- Dr. Starkey presented how the government authorities are misleading the public and dismissing evidence of harm. Dr. Starkey’s PPT is a critical look going point by point over the misinformation.
- Project Censored Investigations: How Big Wireless Convinced Us Cell Phones and Wi-Fi are Safe, “PhoneGate:” French Study Finds 9 of 10 Cell Phones Exceed Safe Radiation Limits.
- Seattle Magazine, “UW Scientist Henry Lai Makes Waves in the Cell Phone Industry.” Seattle Magazine on Motorola working to create doubt and attack Dr. Lai’s research finding DNA damage.
Investigate Europe’s Three Part Investigation on 5G
“At least three studies over the years have documented that there is often a link between conclusions of studies and the source of the money that paid for the research. Science funded by industry is less likely to find health risks than studies paid for by institutions or authorities….Studies which are solely financed by industry are likely to be biased” – Investigate Europe, 2019 Investigate Europe alleges the existence of an “ICNIRP cartel.” The journalists identified a group of fourteen scientists who either helped create, or defend, the EMF exposure guidelines disseminated by ICNIRP, a non- governmental organization (NGO) based in Germany. ICNIRP’s self-selected members argue that the thousands of peer-reviewed studies that have found harmful biologic or health effects from chronic exposure to non-thermal levels of EMF are insufficient to warrant stronger safety guidelines. “The ICNIRP Cartel: Who’s Who in the EMF Research World,” an interactive graphic developed by Investigate Europe (German ICNIRP Cartel). Dr. Moskowitz PDF of ICNIRP Cartel
https://ehtrust.org/telecom-industry-influence-into-cell-phone-science/Source