[1] T. Wu, T. S. Rappaport, and C. M. Collins, “Safe for Generations to Come,”IEEE Microw Mag, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 65–84, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1109/MMM.2014.2377587.
[2] A. M. El-Hajj and T. Naous, “Radiation Analysis in a Gradual 5G Network Deployment Strategy,” in 2020 IEEE 3rd 5G World Forum (5GWF), Sep. 2020, pp. 448–453. doi: 10.1109/5GWF49715.2020.9221314.
[3] IBN-Team, “Standard of Building Biology Testing Methods SBM –,” (accessed Jul. 22, 2021).
[4] J. Friedman, S. Kraus, Y. Hauptman, Y. Schiff, and R. Seger, “Mechanism of short-term ERK activation by electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequencies,” Biochem. J., vol. 405, no. 3, pp. 559–568, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1042/BJ20061653.
[5] A. A. Warille et al., “Skeptical approaches concerning the effect of exposure to electromagnetic fields on brain hormones and enzyme activities,”J Microsc Ultrastruct, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 177–184, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jmau.2017.09.002.
[6] F. Azimipour, S. Zavareh, and T. Lashkarbolouki, “The Effect of Radiation Emitted by Cell Phone on The Gelatinolytic Activity of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 and -9 of Mouse Pre-Antral Follicles during In Vitro Culture,” Cell J, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.22074/cellj.2020.6548.
[7] M. Durdik et al., “Microwaves from mobile phone induce reactive oxygen species but not DNA damage, preleukemic fusion genes and apoptosis in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells,”

Sci Rep, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 16182, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52389-x.

[9] V. Leach, S. Weller, and M. Redmayne, “A novel database of bio-effects from non-ionizing radiation,” Reviews on Environmental Health, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 273–280, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1515/reveh-2018-0017.
[10] M. L. Pall, “Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects,” J. Cell. Mol. Med. , vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 958–965, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12088.
[11] A. Görlach, K. Bertram, S. Hudecova, and O. Krizanova, “Calcium and ROS: A mutual interplay,” Redox Biol, vol. 6, pp. 260–271, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.08.010.
[12] A. A. Alfadda and R. M. Sallam, “Reactive Oxygen Species in Health and Disease,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2012. (accessed May 06, 2020).
[13] I. Yakymenko, O. Tsybulin, E. Sidorik, D. Henshel, O. Kyrylenko, and S. Kyrylenko, “Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation,” Electromagn Biol Med, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 186–202, 2016, doi: 10.3109/15368378.2015.1043557.
[14] I. Yakymenko, E. Sidorik, D. Henshel, and S. Kyrylenko, “Low intensity radiofrequency radiation: a new oxidant for living cells,” Oxidants and Antioxidants in Medical Science, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2014.
[15] M. Sepehrimanesh and D. L. Davis, “Proteomic impacts of electromagnetic fields on the male reproductive system,” Comp Clin Pathol, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 309–313, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00580-016-2342-x.
[16] E. G. Kıvrak, K. K. Yurt, A. A. Kaplan, I. Alkan, and G. Altun, “Effects of electromagnetic fields exposure on the antioxidant defense system,” J Microsc Ultrastruct, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 167–176, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jmau.2017.07.003.
[17] O. P. Gandhi, “Microwave Emissions From Cell Phones Exceed Safety Limits in Europe and the US When Touching the Body,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 47050–47052, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906017.
[18] “OPINION of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the possible health effects associated with high specific absorption rate values from mobile telephones carried close to the body,” ANSES, Opnion 2017-SA-0229, Jul. 2019. [Online]. Available:
[19] Zothansiama, M. Zosangzuali, M. Lalramdinpuii, and G. C. Jagetia, “Impact of radiofrequency radiation on DNA damage and antioxidants in peripheral blood lymphocytes of humans residing in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations,” Electromagn Biol Med, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 295–305, 2017, doi: 10.1080/15368378.2017.1350584.
[20] L. Slesin, “Time to Clean House,” Microwave News, Apr. 07, 2020. (accessed May 20, 2020).
[21] N. R. Desai, K. K. Kesari, and A. Agarwal, “Pathophysiology of cell phone radiation: oxidative stress and carcinogenesis with focus on male reproductive system,” Reprod Biol Endocrinol, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 114, 2009, doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-114.
[22] A. B. Miller, L. L. Morgan, I. Udasin, and D. L. Davis, “Cancer epidemiology update, following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (Monograph 102),”

MORE INFO HERE  Nigeria Senate Debates 5G | Environmental Health Trust

Environmental Research, vol. 167, pp. 673–683, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.043.

[23] L. Hardell and M. Carlberg, “Using the Hill viewpoints from 1965 for evaluating strengths of evidence of the risk for brain tumors associated with use of mobile and cordless phones,”

Rev Environ Health, vol. 28, no. 2–3, pp. 97–106, 2013, doi: 10.1515/reveh-2013-0006.

[24] A. Bortkiewicz, E. Gadzicka, and W. Szymczak, “Mobile phone use and risk for intracranial tumors and salivary gland tumors – A meta-analysis,” Int J Occup Med Environ Health, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 27–43, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00802.
[25] M. Prasad, P. Kathuria, P. Nair, A. Kumar, and K. Prasad, “Mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours: a systematic review of association between study quality, source of funding, and research outcomes,” Neurol Sci, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 797–810, May 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-2850-8.
[26] M. Yang et al., “Mobile phone use and glioma risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” PLOS ONE, vol. 12, no. 5, p. e0175136, May 2017, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175136.
[27] J. Luo et al., “Genetic susceptibility may modify the association between cell phone use and thyroid cancer: A population-based case-control study in Connecticut,” Environmental Research, vol. 182, p. 109013, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.109013.
[28] S. Dasdag and M. Z. Akdag, “The link between radiofrequencies emitted from wireless technologies and oxidative stress,” J. Chem. Neuroanat., vol. 75, no. Pt B, pp. 85–93, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.09.001.
[29] D. Belpomme, L. Hardell, I. Belyaev, E. Burgio, and D. O. Carpenter, “Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: An international perspective,” Environmental Pollution , vol. 242, pp. 643–658, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.019.
[30] T. Tillmann et al., “Indication of cocarcinogenic potential of chronic UMTS-modulated radiofrequency exposure in an ethylnitrosourea mouse model,” International Journal of Radiation Biology, vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 529–541, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.3109/09553001003734501.
[31] A. Vornoli, L. Falcioni, D. Mandrioli, L. Bua, and F. Belpoggi, “The Contribution of In Vivo Mammalian Studies to the Knowledge of Adverse Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation on Human Health,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 16, no. 18, Art. no. 18, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183379.
[32] L. Falcioni et al., “Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission,” Environmental Research, vol. 165, pp. 496–503, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.037.
[33] M. Soffritti and L. Giuliani, “The carcinogenic potential of non-ionizing radiations: The cases of S-50 Hz MF and 1.8 GHz GSM radiofrequency radiation,” Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, vol. 125, no. S3, pp. 58–69, 2019, doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13215.
[34] S. L. Smith‐Roe et al., “Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure,” Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 276–290, 2020, doi: 10.1002/em.22343.
[35] D. J. Panagopoulos, “Comparing DNA damage induced by mobile telephony and other types of man-made electromagnetic fields,” Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, vol. 781, pp. 53–62, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.03.003. Source: Environmental Health Trust