For many years, beginning in 2013, I have been advocating for a debate to resolve the conflicting opinions regarding the health effects of wireless radiation. Most recently, I did it in my article: ‘Call for consensus debate on mobile phone radiation and health: Are current safety guidelines sufficient to protect everyone’s health?‘
In my opinion, the article published on April 7, 2026, in New York’s ‘The Sun’ underlines the necessity for a debate. The opinions of ICNIRP and of ICBE-EMF contradict each other in many ways. This feeds confusion and mistrust in science, not to mention the potential for conflict of interest.
I was interviewed and am quoted in this New York’s ‘The Sun’ story about wireless radiation and health… and my ‘middle way’ interpretations are accounted…
“…But as far back as 2011, the WHO’s own International Agency for Research on Cancer classified wireless radiation as a possible carcinogen. An adjunct professor of biochemistry at the University of Helsinki, Dariusz Leszczynski, who participated in the 2011 evaluation, told the Sun that science has long since moved past that designation.”
“…Currently, the animal data have become much stronger and indicate that, in certain situations, humans might be at risk of developing cancer from wireless exposures,” said Mr. Leszczynski, who serves as chief editor of the journal “Radiation and Health” at Frontiers in Public Health. “It should be taken seriously, as toxicology data, and not dismissed because ‘rats are not humans’ and similar trivial reasoning.”
“…Long-term health studies on exposure from 5G at the population scale do not yet exist. Mr. Leszczynski said it is telling what that gap reveals.
“…We do not know how human physiology reacts to wireless exposures, not only 5G but all others too,” he said. “When not knowing biochemistry, all talk about confirmed safety is nonsense.”
Read opinions of others here: New York’s ‘The Sun.’