“I am inclined to rule against you” stated Judge Robert L. Wilkins to the FCC.
We had our day in court. The truth was on our side and the judges asked excellent questions indicating that they read the scientific and policy evidence EHT submitted to the FCC over the last decade now used as evidence in the case.
Environmental Health Trust et al v. FCC is an historic case aimed at getting the FCC to reconsider, revise, and update its 24-year old exposure limits for radiofrequency radiation (RFR) from cellphones, cell towers, Wi-Fi networks, smart meters, and other wireless communication devices and facilities.
“I’m just going to be very upfront with why I am inclined to rule against you,” stated Judge Robert L. Wilkins to FCC counsel Ashley S. Boizelle questioning how the FCC determined safety evaluations had been completed.
“And so I’m just trying to understand how the FDA coming back and talking about cellphones that are in a holster—where nobody keeps them anymore—or in a purse when they’re not being used is at all… and looking only at cancer is at all relevant to an Inquiry, again, into the effect of this radiation frequency from multiple devices that are used in entirely different ways now, in entirely different volume, and throughout the population, including children who live on iPads.” – Judge Patricia Ann Millet
https://ehtrust.org/judge-wilkins-to-the-fcc-i-am-inclined-to-rule-against-you-video-court-transcript-and-press-conference-replay/ Source: Environmental Health Trust
