Published in the Canberra Times on January 14, 2022

Also well worth a viewing is a youtube presentation by Julian Cribb:

HISTORICAL NOTE: Cribb has good reason to distrust the political circus, especially the Liberal Party.  I mentioned Julian Cribb in my 2012 paper: A Machiavellian Spin Political and corporate involvement with cell phone research in Australia

Excerpt  from 2012 (on how Liberal Party Federal politics corrupts science)

…In order to ‘improve’ CSIRO communication, in May 2002 Garrett removed Julian Cribb as Director of National Awareness (public communication) at CSIRO. Cribb, the principal of Julian Cribb & Associates, specialists in science communication, was eminently qualified for his former communications appointment at CSIRO. He was Adjunct Professor of Science Communication at the University of Technology Sydney and had authored a book Sharing Knowledge, a manual for effective science communication.

In early 2004, CSIRO head Dr. Garrett with the approval of Science Minister Peter McGauran took an unusual step by announcing the creation of a new CSIRO senior staff position of “Director of Communications” as one of his initiatives to make CSIRO into more of a money making “corporate business” instead of an agency doing research predominantly in the public interest. A number of CSIRO staff objected, since the position had been created and imposed on the organisation from above, and not by any normal procedures involving the scientific committees of the organisation. In spite of these objections, Donna Staunton was selected and took up the new staff position at CSIRO, on March 1st, 2004, on a three year contract staff position with salary of around $330,000 a year, placing Staunton in the top four earners in CSIRO at roughly three times the salary of a senior research scientist. When CSIRO management made a brief announcement to their staff of her hiring it did not mention her background qualifications but said she “is highly regarded in political and corporate spheres.” According to science journalist, Dr. Peter Pockley, writing in Australasian Science, it was widely considered that Staunton was selected on Garrett’s personal recommendation. The job specification did not require the appointee to have any experience in science or its communication. Staunton stated that her expertise is in “risk management and reputation management”. According to her consultancy’s website at the time Staunton “brings a very deep knowledge of the corporate sector to this business. She understands the way the corporate sector needs to successfully interact with its many stakeholders – the media, government, shareholders, the investment community, staff, customers and the general public.” As CSIRO Director of Communications one of Staunton’s tasks was liaising between the media and agency scientists, essentially working as a censor through which agency scientific findings would be put before releasing to the media and public.

Donna Staunton’s previous experience illustrated that conflict of interest was a non-issue in the new corporate CSIRO. She had previously been a lawyer with the legal firm Clayton Utz where her job was to handle work for tobacco cases on behalf of the industry. She later became Chief Executive Officer of the Tobacco Institute of Australia and Vice President for Corporate Affairs of the Philip Morris Group. Guy Nolch, Editor of Australasian Science raised concerns over Staunton’s tobacco past on March 30, 2004 when he wrote that: “It’s unlikely that trust in science can improve in Australia when public comment from its premier scientific research organisation if filtered by a manager who has used science to put corporate interests ahead of community health.” Nolch, put it more strongly in a May 28, 2004 email to CSIRO CEO Dr. Garrett: “Staunton’s appointment is an endorsement by CSIRO of the tobacco industry, and signals CSIRO’s desire to employ the methods Staunton used to put the interests of the tobacco industry ahead of the interests of public health.”

MORE INFO HERE  Karel Husa ~ Apotheosis of this Earth

Stanton also held a position on the board of the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA), an organisation that proclaimed that it was “Australia’s Leading Free Market Think Tank”. As for its position on climate change, IPA considered global warming a natural cyclic event and all climate scientists who thought otherwise were suffering from the disease of “Mother Earthism” with a “touching belief in the Garden of Eden, the halcyon state of the Earth in times before the wicked Industrial revolution.” Such strong statements were in sharp contrast to the CSIRO’s climate change division where they have stated: “Over the past 200 years, human activities have significantly altered the world’s atmosphere.” As a reflection of how the CSIRO had changed under the guidance of Garrett and Staunton, in 2005 the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA) gave CSIRO management a special commendation in its George Orwell Awards for those who have done the most to suppress press freedom….SNIP


And now on to Cribb’s latest article

January 14 2022 – 5:25AM

·         Julian Cribb

Politicians are increasingly grappling with phenomena beyond their limited expertise – if they’re paying attention at all.

Paralysis. Atrophy. Inertia. Perplexity. These terms describe the state of mind of governments around the world, grappling with an existential crisis they do not understand and whose course they appear impotent to change.

None of the usual levers work, push them or pull them how you will. You can’t halt wildfires by printing money, settle COVID with tax breaks, subsidise the sea so it stops rising, or battle global overheating with armies. The whole political juggernaut, lovingly hammered, screwed and bolted together by politicians and economists over nearly two centuries, is at last seen for what it is: a fantastic, rust-bucket contraption of whistles and wheels that no longer works, if indeed it ever did.

The science has been in for some time. Modern industrial civilisation is headed for collapse under the onset of 10 catastrophic threats which, singly, severally and collectively, traditional national politics now seems powerless to resolve. It doesn’t help that the world has recently chosen many political leaders – both democratic and autocratic – without the intelligence, learning or ability to understand what is happening. But don’t they look good on TV?

Search where you will, the picture is similar. Governments are grappling with phenomena beyond their limited experience or expertise, and failing dismally. The trust which the public once reposed in politics and leaders has evaporated in the face of their patent inability to cope, and in the sewerfall of lies and half-truths they now feel compelled to gush forth to disguise their inadequacy.

Of course, there are exceptions. New Zealand, Bhutan, most of the Scandinavian countries and Germany, perhaps, are doing their best. But, in the face of an overwhelming existential emergency which most other nations are seeking to make worse, it is never going to be enough. Certainly, individual countries alone are not capable of overcoming any of the catastrophic threats. These are global threats, requiring global action.

MORE INFO HERE  The Story of 5G in Historic Pensacola 

Politics, the charming theatre that has held the world enthralled for over a century and a half, is collapsing like a pricked balloon. The Earth won’t be saved by communism, capitalism, deism, socialism, liberalism, monarchism or any other -ism. There is no longer any point to political ideology. All it can do is distract us with frivolous argument from the main task of trying to save ourselves. The more “politics” we engage in, the lower our chances of survival.

Unfortunately, for many, it is their chief sport and entertainment. They adore the lunge and riposte of politics, no matter how pointless they now appear. They will sacrifice their children for mere spectacle.

Unfit for purpose

Let us apply a simple test to human governance, to establish how fit it is for the 21st century. How many countries have either a constitution or a policy committing them to human survival? The answer is none. Most, apparently, don’t even know it is at stake. The data telling them that civilisation is in peril has been available for up to 50 years, but like good little politicians they have managed to bury the facts under a fantasy of never-ending growth, wealth and “happiness”.

You cannot negotiate with physics, horse-trade with chemistry or filibuster biology – and these are the forces now shaping human destiny. Unfortunately, with the marvellous exception of Angela Merkel, most recent political leaders have no education whatsoever in these disciplines. Where the existential emergency is concerned, they are little better than beached mullet, thrashing around without insight or direction.

Politics is one of the four great mass delusions (the others are money, religion and the human narrative). It is a thing that people constantly put their faith in, all objective evidence to the contrary. It is meat and drink to a media that prizes entertainment more than it does information. And, if political differences are one of the triggers for a nuclear war or a climate stalemate, then it can destroy the human species a good deal more effectively than any pandemic.

Another reason that politics, at least of the national variety, is finished is that it is running out of money. Once upon a time, governments controlled or oversaw most of the wealth within their borders. Now much of that wealth has been seized by global corporations – and governments no longer have it to dispense to grateful voters or citizens. Their only recourse is to lie to those who elect or appoint them, as they no longer have the funds to keep their promises. Intent on short-term profit, the corporations do little or nothing for human survival. Economic globalisation has sandbagged world systems of governance while hardly anybody noticed.

To take a single example: the flood of more than 200 billion tonnes of chemicals emitted by human activity is killing over 12 million people a year and crippling 600 million more – twice as many victims as World War II. But are governments trying seriously to stop it? No, partly because they do not understand it and partly because they are hand-in-glove with the polluters – and what the latter do satisfies the government’s political ends. It is a clear case of politics failing to serve the interests of humanity while it continues to serve the interests of the killers. The situation is similar with climate and extinction, although there is more lip-service by politicians about the need to do something.

MORE INFO HERE  1997 Boston MA Physicians’ and Scientists’ Petition To Avert Public Exposures to Microwaves

What comes next?

So, if “politics”, as defined by the 19th and 20th centuries, is broken, is there any fixing it? Not while definitions irrelevant to human survival, like “left” and “right”, remain in the ascendant. And not while political economics promises illusory wealth while it quietly devours the habitability of the planet.

However, for the first time in the history of our species, humans are having an Earth-wide conversation about these matters – sharing knowledge, experience, wisdom and solutions to the mounting threats we face. The internet has over 5 billion participants (out of the world’s population of nearly 8 billion). By 2030, everyone will be online. This is the first (and last) chance we have ever had to think together as a species. To earn our self-lauding title “sapiens”.

The slow collapse of industrial civilisation is already under way, and is accelerating. It is written in an increasingly savage climate, a toxic world, in raging pandemics (there have been six since 2000, in case you didn’t notice), in the obliteration of nature and its ability to sustain life, in the rising scarcity of essentials like water, soil, forests and fish. Politics, absorbed in its own theatre, treats these matters as side issues compared to the trivia which are its daily fare. By the time it awakens, it will be far too late to fix any of them – and anyway, today’s politicians will not know how. Human survival is not even on their agenda.

Hope, if it still exists, resides in the increasing outreach of individuals and groups around the planet to one another, seeking to come together and collaborate to address the existential emergency. It resides in female leadership, not male. It lies in the universal sharing of wisdom and co-operation (as distinct from competition and conflict) across the whole of humanity.

In today’s politics lies only the haemorrhage of precious time and the opportunity to save ourselves.

  • Julian Cribb AM is an Australian science writer and the author of several books on the human existential crisis.

Leave a reply → Source