Dariusz Leszczynski’s analysis draws a different conclusion on the Ramazzini study. It is sure to draw many comments on his blog: Between a Rock and a Hard Place. Keep an eye out for the discussion!
Don
*****************
Excerpts:
On March 22, 2018, journal ‘Environmental Research‘ published a peer-reviewed article: “Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission” by Falcioni et al, with the lead author Fiorella Belpoggi, Head or Research at the Ramazzini Institute in Italy.
The study has been justly heralded as the largest to-date animal study examining the effects of cell phone base station-emitted radiation on rats….SNIP
Following the publication of Ramazzini study, various news media and website outlets informed that this peer-reviewed study not only strengthens the evidence of the NTP study but that the Ramazzini study is a “game-changer“. However. there is a problem with the Ramazzini study and calling it a “game-changer” might be premature.
Read Leszczynski’s analysis here
************************************************************************
Leave a reply → https://www.emfacts.com/2018/03/leszczynski-ramazzini-study-shows-that-cell-tower-radiation-does-not-increase-risk-for-schwannoma-and-glioma/
