
Law 360 DC Circ. Picks Apart FCC Over 5G Wireless Safety Review
“A federal appeals panel in Washington voiced skepticism that the Federal Communications Commission had adequately considered dangerous health effects when it established guidelines for radiation emission from cell towers and wireless devices…”
CHD is represented by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Chairman of Children’s Health Defense who has championed numerous cases involving industrial pollution -including Monsanto Roundup weedkiller cancer litigation and major water contamination cases– and by Scott McCullough, a seasoned telecom attorney, former Assistant Texas Attorney General, who represented the Irregulators in Irregulators vs the FCC. Mr. McCullough presented all of the Petitioners’ joint argument in oral argument. The three-judge panel in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that presides over the case includes the Honorable Karen Henderson, Patricia Millett and Robert Wilkins.
The Petitioners contend the FCC ignored the extensive evidence submitted to the agency showing that non-thermal levels of pulsed and modulated RFR emitted by wireless technology are harmful to humans, wildlife and the environment, and its order failed to provide a record of a reasoned decision making. Therefore, the Petitioners claim the FCC has violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and its decision is capricious, arbitrary and not evidence-based. In addition, the Petitioners argue that the FCC violated NEPA because the agency did not consider the environmental impacts of its decision. FCC also violated the 1996 Telecommunications Act (TCA) in failing to consider the impact of its decision on public health and safety.
The FCC ignored numerous submissions detailing injuries and rapidly growing illnesses from radiofrequency radiation, and ignored calls such as those from the cities of Boston and Philadelphia to address the injury. Petitioners argued that the inadequate FCC guidelines are used to deny accommodation in violation of the Americans with Disability Act. The Petitioners filed 11,000 pages of evidence – 447 exhibits in 27 Volumes- in support of their claims. Environmental Health Trust researchers filed 60 of the 447 exhibits and scientific studies published by EHT experts are considered crucial in the case as they focus on cancer and impacts to children.
Edward B. Myers is an attorney practicing in the United States of America. For over 40 years, Mr. Myers has represented government, trade associations and private clients in complex regulatory matters involving energy, telecommunications and the environment. In 2018, Mr. Myers worked with the Natural Resources Defense Council in a successful challenge to an order of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that had sought to eliminate any environmental review of 5G cell towers and transmitters. Mr. Myers presently is representing the Environmental Health Trust and other parties in the appeal of a FCC decision not to revise safety standards for radiofrequency emissions from cell phones and cell phone towers and equipment. Mr. Myers is a graduate of Gettysburg College and the University of Notre Dame Law School.
Founder and President of Environmental Health Trust
Executive Director of Environmental Health Trust and Petitioner in EHT et al. v. FCC
https://ehtrust.org/5g-wireless-harms-lawsuit-against-the-fcc-eht-et-al-v-fcc/ Source: Environmental Health Trust
Spread the word:
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
- Click to print (Opens in new window)