Eight Repeatedly Documented Findings Each Show that EMF Safety Guidelines Do NotPredict Biological Effects and Are, Therefore Fraudulent:The Consequences for Both Microwave Frequency Exposures and Also 5GSecond Edition, May 23, 2019Source: RF Safety Guidelines Fraud2 Pall 5-23-2019.pdf – Google Drive SourceSpread the word:Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window)MORE INFO HERE How do mobile phones work?Related Posts22/04/2024Robert F. Kennedy Jr. | EMF Hazards Summit 2024Advice,Health & science,Mobile,EMF,WiFi,WiGIG22/04/202460+ years since Silent Spring: Where are we now? Endocrine-disrupting chemical exposures in early life, sexual identity and male fertility decline. Is there a connection?Advice,Health & science,EMF21/04/2024Protected: Press Release: Concealed FCC Cell Phone Radiation Tests Show Human ‘Exposure Limits Were Exceeded’Psychology,Health & sciencePrevNext
