The implementation of 5G is a giant and all-pervasive experiment on the citizens of the United States, using a cruel technology already known to be harmful. It is being heavily promoted by President Trump and his telecommunications industry (formerly Verizon-employed)-appointee, Chairman of the FCC, Ajit Pai, Esq., and the telecommunications industry, all of whom are ignoring the dire warnings of scientists who say this will be an experiment on the public with disastrous results. For more on the health effects predicted, click here.

The New England Journal of Medicine describes the Nuremberg Code and why it is so important. People have a right not to be experimented on without their knowledge and against their will. Especially when it is known that disabling illness can result. But yet, this is set to happen.

In letters you may write to elected officials or others to alert them to the dangers and implications for public health, in litigation that you or others may initiate, do include quotations from the Nuremberg Code.

We ask that you consider this and take all legal actions necessary to stop the implementation of 5G in the United States and beyond.

The Nuremberg Code:

  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
MORE INFO HERE  Articles on 5G

This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

MORE INFO HERE  [Press release] ANFR: French Administrative Court refuses Dr Arazi’s requests

3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

MORE INFO HERE  5G networks are being deployed and 5G hand-held devices are being tested – soon, it all will become commercial

9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.”

http://www.electrosmogprevention.org/international-electrosmog-prevention-news/stop-5g/the-significance-of-the-nuremberg-code-as-it-applies-to-5g/