Re: Confirmation of immediate cessation of various breaches of legal obligations and duties of care.

Summary of statements of evidence prepared, submitted and accepted for UK criminal investigation, Crime Number 6029679/21, as well as filing at (ICC) International Criminal Courts

This statement is in connection with your role in supporting the deployment of the SARS-CoV-2 injections in the United Kingdom.

These injections are unsafe, still in clinical trial, and must be withdrawn immediately, now that we have the vast body of evidence of their life threatening and mortality effects on the population of the United Kingdom and associated territories. Your failure to investigate these now known concerns amounts to gross negligence in office, and renders you personally and the executive board liable for serious Misconduct in a Public Office, Misfeasance in a Public Office and / or, rendering all the office holders potentially liable for corporate manslaughter – in that you have been ignorant of the known harms of the SARS-CoV-2 injections. Your actions or omissions from now on will confirm if you have, wilfully, failed in that duty.

The Witnesses are:

Dr Sam White, herein after referred to as “Dr White”. Dr White has evidenced concerns of the lack of safety regarding the vaccine and the suppression of safe and effective therapeutics.


All those now injured are owed a duty of care by you to suspend authorisation of the SARS- CoV-2 injections and their clinical trials on evidence of a material risk. Thousands of peer reviewed papers now confirm irrefutable life threatening effects from this so called vaccine. And the real intention of its deployment.

By failing in your duty of care you have committed a tort.

Evidence has been gathered from the Office for National Statistics as well as statements from local funeral directors of the now explainable increases in mortality from the experimental Covid 19 vaccinations.

You are in breach of your duty and more so, now that you have the incontrovertible evidence of the dangers posed to the community you serve. Failing to take immediate action to remedy and avoid the preventable, and avoidable harms of SARS-CoV-2 injections will cause you to be included in the wider criminal investigation.

The known facts of the SARS-CoV-2 injections are as follows:

  1. According to expert evidence relied on for this criminal investigation, the US data shows that the SARS-CoV-2 injections are lethal in nature and cause significant bodily harm.
  2. According to expert evidence relied on for the criminal investigation, the true level of adverse events for SARS-CoV-2 injections is likely 11 times higher than that reported by the MHRA, which currently reports over 1,378,846 non-fatal (as yet) but serious reactions and 1,913 Fatal. These deaths will rise exponentially due to the Cancer and immune deficiency disease caused by this experimental drug as confirmed in the published peer reviewed science.

Your employment specifically requires a duty to protect the population from adverse health outcomes that is enshrined in law of which you are aware, therefore there can be no excuse for your failing to react to the data posted by the Government on these shocking adverse reactions and deaths. The information over the life-threatening risks has been withheld from the general public, with no public announcements by official bodies, including yours.

For the avoidance of doubt, ‘doing as you’re told’ supporting government guidance is no defence in law, neither is ignorance. Your support in avoiding the full weight of this criminal negligence is now required to mitigate your complicity and a public announcement is therefore required.

I am formally requesting that you will confirm in writing on or before 17th January 2022, that you undertake to do the following:

  1. Stop all clinical trials of the SARS-CoV-2 injections in your area immediately
  2. Publish all the ingredients and harms caused by the injections to the public.
  3. Warn the public of the high risks and lethality of the experimental vaccinations, as your duty requires.
  4. Warn those suffering headaches from the experimental vaccinations to seek immediate health care and a D-dimer test to check for micro clotting in the brain caused by the COVID 19 vaccines. These symptoms can lead to stroke, heart attack and death if medical intervention is not sought for the blood clotting.
  5. Have the ingredients of the COVID 19 vaccines checked by independent researchers for toxicity, with criminal standards of evidence gathering regarding chain of custody of the evidence.

Fact: All the SARS-CoV-2 injections are still in clinical trial under the Clinical Trial Regulations 2002.

It is gross misconduct not to bring to the board’s attention and/or take action on concerns regarding safety and efficacy of the SARS-CoV-2 injections notified by the public to the MHRA.

You may be liable for corporate manslaughter and/or other criminal offences for omitting to rectify concerns when they were brought to your attention.

A gross dereliction of duty amounts to gross negligence which is a form of gross misconduct.

Misconduct in public office and or gross negligence in public office amounts to a tort as well as a criminal offence, the actual criminal offence that is under investigation as we continue gathering evidence against the wilful actions of those in public health office.

The Corman Drosten review, described the Drosten paper and subsequent use of PCR tests as academic fraud. We have expert witness evidence from Doctor Lidya Angelova, one of the authors of the review. It should be noted that the Portuguese Court of Appeal, in upholding the fundamental human rights of their citizens, found the use of PCR tests without a Doctor overseeing the process was and is unlawful as causing harm and breaching human rights.

The whole basis of the public health emergency was based on falsified statistics and asymptomatic test data from the PCR test, a fraud. This had the desired and intended effect to cause fear, alarm and distress across the population in breach of the 2000 – 2006 Terrorism acts. SAGE Scientific Advisory group for Emergencies in their own documentation have admitted to terrifying the population by falsifying data, terrorizing of an ignorant, uninformed population.

Mask wearing is only virtual signalling of compliance with government guidance causes significant detrimental health problems especially in our young children, which can be show to be child abuse. There currently is no scientific basis for these mandates that cause bacterial pneumonia and oxygen deprivation as shown in the published papers. The Government have failed in producing any scientific data that supports this assault on the people as its use is only a measure of the psychological damage cause by terrorizing of the population. No risk assessment has been produced by your department on the harms done to employees etc. from mask wearing, a further failure in protecting public health from demonstrably false and misleading advice from those in authority and those subject to this current criminal investigation.

Expert statement from Professor Sucharit Bhakdi detailing the harms of the SARS-CoV-2 injections. In particular Professor Bhakdi states with great clarity the design of the SARS-CoV-2 injections are such that they cannot work but there only purpose is to cause harm.

Expert statement from Professor Dr Arne Burkehardt, a pathologist, which details findings from the post mortems of 15 deceased but injected. The statement reads:

…Histopathological findings of similar nature were detected in organs

Expert statement from Dr Urso detailing the risk from the SARS-CoV-2 injection of ADE subsequently borne out by clinical data from the PHE. “We observe the excess deaths in homes noted by Professor Heneghan”.

Expert statement from Dr Clare Craig opiniong that the excess deaths seen in young adults is “likely due to Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 injections”.

Expert statement from Professor Dolores Cahill describing the harm, injury, adverse events and deaths reported following the SARS-CoV-2 injections in the clinical trials including those due to Immune related Adverse Events and Antibody Dependent Enhancement. Professor Cahill’s opinion is that under the ‘First do no Harm’ and the Precautionary Principle, because of the evidence of harm, loss, adverse events, injury and death reported to men, women and children on the SARS-CoV-2 clinical trials, Professor Dolores Cahill has evoked the ‘First do no Harm’ and the Precautionary Principle to ask for the immediate halt to the SARS-CoV-2 injections /clinical trials.

Expert statement from witness identified as Marek Pawlewski MSc (data analytics expert) showing the SARS-CoV-2 injection is 91 times more deadly than the Flu injection in a year-on-year analysis based on reports of adverse events.

Expert statement from witness identified as Mark Steele, battlefield weapons research scientist, showing that the COVID 19 Vaccinations, and Technologies are instrumental for future digitization control and augmented society defence agenda’s, through the connectivity of Nano Metamaterials delivered into the body through injections.

You may yourself have been deceived by this well-orchestrated media narrative, until now. Once you have availed yourself of the actual facts of this major criminal investigation, it is your duty to remedy and regard the primary legislation and not the current government guidance as health policy. If you have had the technology injected into yourself, its potency has obviously not been such as to cause you immediate death or serious injury, however you may suffer long term health problems if it was not a placebo.

We will await your earliest response on the suggested action plan, now that you have been made of the actual information and the clear and present danger to all human beings.